Genette narrative discourse online dating
This is not neutral; it emphasises some traits and suppresses others.Unlike this, the act of comparing furthers the understanding of differences and similarities, and may bare hidden assumptions.Even in Genette’s work, there is a contradiction between the definition and the names of the two categories: Genette defines homo- and heterodiegesis with reference to the narrator’s presence in the narrated story, whereas he elsewhere states that the diegesis (in the sense of French diégèse) is »auniverse rather than a train of events (a story)«: it »is therefore not the story but the universe in which the story takes place« (Genette 1988, 17; italics in original).
The operation of framing something as something else works by taking some notions of the source domain (narratives) and applying them to the target domain (games).Simone Elisabeth Lang Between Story and Narrated World: Reflections on the Difference between Homo- and Heterodiegesis (Abstract) Full-length article in: JLT 8/2 (2014), 368–396.In describing the position of the narrator, research in literary studies generally follows Gérard Genette’s pioneering theory of narrative in distinguishing between the homo- and heterodiegetic type of narrator.It is all the more remarkable that narrators of this kind have often been classed as heterodiegetic in the past.
Distinguishing between ontological difference and involvement in events provides a foundation for a more refined description of the narrator, one that is particularly significant in the case of narration that is unreliable or concerned with the unreal. B., How to cite this item: Abstract of: Simone Elisabeth Lang, Between Story and Narrated World: Reflections on the Difference between Homo- and Heterodiegesis.If the narrator is not involved in events, the question arises of whether it would in principle have been possible for him to be involved in events, which is the norm with ›homodiegetic, not in the story‹ narrators, or whether a physical impossibility is the reason for his lack of involvement in the story.